Friday, June 29, 2012

Obama/Romney 'Obamacare' - The Facts...

Since the Supreme Court announced the decision on the Affordable Care Act, both sides, left and right have made several claims about what the ACA does or doesn't do.

Naureen Khan of the National Review looks at a few of the most common claims:

A preview:


CAMPAIGN 2012

Obama, Romney, 'Obamacare' and the Facts

In the spinfest after the Supreme Court ruling, the presidential candidates are straying.

Updated: June 29, 2012 | 9:43 p.m.
June 29, 2012 | 4:13 p.m.

The Romney and Obama campaigns have gone into spin overdrive since the Supreme Court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act. So what holds up to the facts and what doesn’t?
Three nonpartisan fact-checking outfits—FactCheck.org, Politifact, and The Fact Checker (The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler)—have done extensive research on various health care claims that have surfaced for the last two years. Here’s a guide to their findings on what you have heard from the presidential candidates about the ruling, and are likely to hear many times again before Election Day:
1. If you like your health insurance plan, you can keep it under the Affordable Care Act.
One of President Obama’s go-to points is that the Affordable Care Act won’t change things for Americans who like their current health insurance plan. On Thursday, in response to the Court’s decision, Obama reiterated, “If you’re one of the more than 250 million Americans who already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance.”
That will be true for most people. But, as Factcheck.org points out, nothing in the Affordable Care Act prevents employers from switching their coverage plans just as they could do before. Also, some of the 30 million Americans who purchase their own insurance may have to change providers if their plan does not meet minimum benefit standards.
In addition, while the law requires employers to pay a penalty if they do not offer insurance, they might pay it because they prefer that their employees purchase insurance through the federally subsidized exchanges. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the law may result in "a small reduction" in the number of people who receive employer-provided insurance.
2. The Affordable Care Act will add trillions to the deficit.
Numerous leading Republicans have said this over and over again, presenting the health care law as another budget-busting initiative by the Obama administration in the same vein... 


Source: http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/obama-romney-obamacare-and-the-facts-20120629

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Supreme Court Finds Affordable Care Act Constitutional...

Shortly before 10:00am, my inbox and facebook page began to percolate as we approached zero hour for the much awaited Supreme Court decision on President Obama's Affordable Care Act. By 10:15am, I was several songs into my first performance of the day. I had my phone sitting on the edge of my mixer and every time I'd look over at it, the number of emails and facebook messages were growing quickly.

During a brief pause, I opened up my twitter feed and saw the headlines. "Obamacare Stands", "Obamacare Constitutional", etc... I finished up my hour, packed up and headed for the car trying to read through all the tweets that had come in.

My initial reaction was relief. Surprised relief.

I knew what awaited me on facebook and in emails. I knew one group would be very happy this had passed, but express this pleasure via some barbs aimed at the Right. Another group would find this decision impossible to accept and take out some of their frustration on the Left. What I knew I'd hear too little of was the better health access for all the uninsured adults and children that will benefit from this.

Its so easy to view this as a game. Its not. Health insurance plays a big part in terms of living a healthy, capable life. Having about 45-50 million uninsured people in our Country is unacceptable. We're the only industrialized Country in the Western Hemisphere that doesn't provide access to good quality, affordable healthcare for all of our citizens. For a lesser Country, that might work, but not for the richest Country in the world. It just doesn't.

Some feel their liberty and freedom were reduced because of the Court's decision today. I'm not sure what was taken away from anyone. You may not like the Individual Mandate, but in reality, it effects a fairly small number of us. If you currently have insurance, which most of us do, it doesn't effect you. If you're over 65, you're eligible for Medicare, so it doesn't effect you. If you earn below the Federal Poverty Line, there's Medicaid, so it doesn't effect you. By getting the free-riders into the pool with the rest of us, over time our premiums should drop.

Since President Reagan signed the Federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), hospitals are required to provide medical services to those needing it with no regard to financial status. We don't let people die on the sidewalk. Hospitals try and collect for their services from patients with no health insurance but often, they are dealing with people who don't have the means to pay these size bills.

Let's suppose a hospitalization for an uninsured accident victim adds up $85,000. With no savings, a payment agreement of $100.00 a month would take 850 months or 70.83 years to pay off. That's crazy. So, typically the hospitals charge a large amount of the uncollectable monies back to Medicaid, which is the guarantor of the Federal Government. That was the deal Reagan made with the hospital industry. You treat everyone who needs it no matter what and if we have to, we'll step in with the bill. You know where the money comes, of course, to pay for these type situations, yes? From tax dollars that people like you and I pay to the government. Is this really the best way to spend our money? No. The mandate helps on that front as well...


The mandate forces all those who don't have insurance, yet can afford it to buy insurance (on the free market) for just such accidents. This way the amount of hospital bills we wind up having to pay gets reduced dramatically with the bulk of the costs being passed onto the health insurance companies. Don't feel too bad for the insurance companies, they are picking up over 30 million new customers. Paying customers...


You don't have to like it, but understand its not reaching into your pocket and ripping out your kids college funds or your retirement. Its a policy that was founded by the republicans during the Clinton presidency. The Heritage Foundation was heavily involved. Prominent Conservatives were on board. If it was "the right thing to do" back in the 1990's, how in the world is it the end of liberty twenty years later? Its not. 


Beyond the mandate, the rest of the Affordable Care Act polls strongly among most Americans. Kids staying on parents plans until 26, free preventive services, donut hole reduction for seniors, no lifetime caps or maximums anymore, etc. The bulk of the ACA (the exchanges) kicks in 2014. This won't cover everyone, but its a big improvement.


Its also not perfect. The mandate penalty for the first year is only $95, the donut hole isn't closed totally for several years, its not very aggressive on costs or quality, etc. Politically its been a heavy lift for this Administration and reaching for even more wasn't practical. We have a long way to go before our health care costs as a percent of GDP are in line with other industrialized countries. We have a long way to go before our outcomes compare favorably with other industrialized countries. We have a long way to go before our coverage compares favorably with other industrialized countries. But today's ruling keeps us on the path towards improving our nation's healthcare delivery system, which is something we simply must do. The previous path was fiscally unsustainable. Doing nothing wasn't an option...





Let's Remember This...

The Supreme Court is about ready to rule on obamacare...Regardless of what happens there will be people very upset. I suspect there will be more attention paid to the political ramifications of this decision than there will be for the actual effects on health care delivery in this country.

We should keep in mind that the affordable care act has a lot of good in it. More people would be insured,  more people would have access to preventative testing and procedures. There is help for senior citizens with the donut hole, help for younger people to be able to stay on their parents insurance policies until they are 26, help for people trying to pay for their healthcare knowing that they can't be cut off because of financial limitations by their insurance carrier. Things like requiring all insurance companies spend at least 85 cents of every premium dollar on direct patient care. And much more...

There is a strong possibility that all or least most of this may be gone within about 40 minutes...

I eagerly await the details of the republican replacement strategy it's time for details, not vague rhetoric...

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Jon Huntsman Interview...


Our hat's being tipped once again in the direction of Pete Dominick, host of Stand Up with Pete Dominick on Sirius/XM Channel 124 (POTUS). Today Dominick interviewed former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, who has served as US Ambassador to China and Singapore. He also ran for President recently but dropped out fairly early after failing to generate what he considered adequate support.

Huntsman was my favorite of the GOP field. The least prone to partisan attacks, yet the most willing to embrace science and research, his was a voice of moderation and intelligence. I hope we see him return to the national stage again in the future.

As usual, Dominick gives his guest tons of time and space to give the audience thoughtful responses. no shouting, no arguing, no gotcha questions. Just a very interesting discussion between two adults. Once again, an example of what quality talk radio can be. This is radio worth paying for.

Listen to Pete's interview with the Governor by clicking here...

Source:

http://standupwithpetedominick.com/segments/audio/06-25-12-gov-jon-huntsman-int

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Supreme Court Rules on Profanity on TV...(New Yorker)

Cute video that accompanies this article from the New Yorker on todays's Supreme Court ruling on profanity on television:



 Fuck, that was funny...

Read the entire article here...