Showing posts with label 9/11. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 9/11. Show all posts

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Calamities of Nature Graph of the Week...







Starting this week, I'll be featuring a comic strip or thought provoking graph from the smart people at "Calamities of Nature." I'm excited to be able to provide some content from their website, which they describe in these terms:


Welcome to Calamities of Nature, a comic that focuses on topics of social commentary, science, religion, philosophy, and lots of bacon. If you're new here, checking out the best of Calamities of Nature is a great place to start.


Calamities of Nature has been online since July 2007. Since that time, it's been viewed by millions of people and won a number of accolades, including being a finalist for the best webcomic of 2010 by the Washington Post, finalist in the2008 Webcomic Idol contest finalist (a comic version of the American Idol show) and a finalist in the 2008 Weblog Awards (the world's largest blog competition, with over a million votes cast) alongside such famous comics as Dilbert and xkcd. Calamities of Nature has also been featured on a number of prominent blogs, including PharyngulaCosmic Variance, and Bad Astronomy(which was named one of Time Magazine's top 25 blogs of 2009).

Special thanks go out to Tony Piro for allowing Reasonable Conversation to feature his work. I encourage my readers to visit his website and enjoy his humor as I have. 

Enjoy!!!

We'll start with a thought provoking graph of a recent anniversary we experienced:


Monday, September 26, 2011

Islamic Center opens in NYC...Life goes on...

Remember all the emotion a few months ago about the proposed "victory mosque" near Ground Zero? Things got pretty heated and some baseless charges were made against those wanting to see the Community Center be built.

I say its fair to be critical of the builders, who should've gotten more input from the families of those lost on 9/11, but all in all, I remain in favor of this Community Center project going forward.

They held their first event there last week.

Islamic Center Opens Its Doors Near Ground Zero | Fox News:

What makes me stop and think is that when all the protests were in full fury, there was quite a bit of media coverage, especially from Fox News and Conservative talk radio. It was wall to wall, it seemed. I would've guessed that when this facility did begin to hold events, there would be major coverage.

I didn't see very much at all. Did you?

I found this article buried on the Fox news website via a link on the religion page. Which, frankly is where it probably belongs. What I'd suggest is that this is just another example of the media making a big deal out of an issue for ratings. The politicians scored a lot of cheap points on this. I saw this in The Daily Caller...

and this gem from the Daily Mail in London....

Controversial Ground Zero mosque site opens - just two weeks after 9/11 anniversary

Should I be encouraged, perhaps slightly, that the media had a smaller appetite for this story?

I think that few opinions have changed since a few months ago. The people that were against it remain so, just as those who supported it. I ask my readers to reconcile the understated coverage of the art exhibit at the opening last week. If the notion was despicable a few months ago, isn't it still?

The media/talk radio are not our friend...they distort things to get ratings and sell newspapers. Both sides do this, and its destructive to those people who genuinely try to understand what's going on. 



Tuesday, September 13, 2011


(Ed. Note: Time is limited for me this morning due to an early performance schedule. I felt this was one of the most compelling segments of the debate last night. I've included a slightly longer segment than originally provided by Mediaite. The supply of credible information backing up Congressman Paul is substantial. Its a losing hand to play, unfortunately and it was sickening to listen to Senator Santorum pander to the crowd... Which is all he was doing. Neither will be our next President but I think Paul is a good man. I think Santorum is a weasel.)

From Mediaite:
Rick Santorum Tells Rep. Ron Paul To Stop ‘Parroting Osama Bin Laden’ At CNN Debate
VIDEO
The ideological rivalry between Rick Santorum and Rep. Ron Paul, arguably the most conservative and libertarian members of the 2012 race that are allowed on debate stages, has become a fascinating subplot of the 2012 debates, and tonight sparks flew as Santorum challenged Rep. Paul’s foreign policy, comparing his opinions to Osama Bin Laden and putting him on a defensive that earned him boos.
“We are under threat because we occupy so many countries,” Rep. Paul began, explaining that the “purpose of al-Qaeda in attacking us” was to “invite us” to invade. Noting the difference between military and defense spending, Rep. Paul argued that America needed “a foreign policy that takes care of our national defense” but is “willing to get along with trade with people.” “There is no authority in the Constitution to be the police of the world,” Rep. Paul concluded.
Santorum, obviously disgusted with that answer, turned to Rep. Paul. “On your website, on 9/11, you had a blog post that basically blamed the United States for 9/11– on your website yesterday,” Santorum noted, “You said that it was our actions that brought about the actions of 9/11.” Calling this “irresponsible,” he demanded of Rep. Paul that a presidential candidate “should not be parroting what Osama Bin Laden said on 9/11,” as the attacks are not a result of our behavior, but because “we have a civilization that is antithetical to the civilization of the jihadists.”
Rep. Paul responded with an attempt to explain what he believed was the motive pushing al-Qaeda, an explanation met with boos– a rare sound in debates, where heavy Paul contingents are typically in attendance. The biggest boo line? The suggesting that America is being unfair to Palestinians.
The segment via CNN below:


Thoughts?

Saturday, September 10, 2011

My 9/11 post... (2018 Edition)



I've been thinking for about a week on the upcoming tenth thirteenth seventeenth anniversary of the attacks on America. I knew more what I didn't want to say than what I did. Billions of words have been written about the events of 9/11. The loss of life, the heroic efforts of the first responders, the sense of nationalism that swept the Country around that time. The lens through which Islam would be viewed through going forward. The causes. The conspiracy theories. Etc. If its remotely connected to that day, there's no shortage of content on the internet that's available. A Google search on "September 11th" and "911" produces over 256 Million returns in less than one second. Using the same search terms on Amazon.com, over 11 thousand returns appeared. 


Should I have just skipped it? That didn't seem right either. Here's what I came up with...

My thoughts on the tenth thirteenth Anniversary of the 9/11 attacks:

Nationalism is not always good...

Islam is not always bad...

I am an American and I love my Country. I am eternally glad I was born here than anywhere else. That said, if I were from Scotland or Canada or Japan or Israel or Syria, I'm guessing I would probably feel the same way. Would I necessarily want to live in those countries is another matter entirely. Economics play a big part in that kind of thing, so to leave your homeland for economic gain hardly cancels one's feelings toward a homeland. Yes, I felt swelled with a sense of nationalism on 9/11. Like many others, I went out to the store that day and purchased a flag. The biggest flag I could hang off of my front porch. That was the thing to do that day for guys like me. We donated to the Red Cross. We followed the news as things unfolded. I added an extra patriotic song to my performances. It wasn't much. It wasn't profound. It's just what I did.

What I didn't do that day, unlike a few of my fellow Ohioans, was to drive to the nearest Mosque and shoot at it. The thought never occurred to me. I'm quite glad for that, because I would've felt rather disgusting if it had. As I watched the images on TV of some in the Middle East dancing and celebrating in the streets, it bothered me. The first reaction was the obvious one. The second one is that many people in those lands have been living with terror and death for a long time. Did I now know how they felt, sort of? Probably not.

We all seek understanding. There's a lot about 9/11 I don't understand.

As the days unfolded and turned into weeks, months and even years, I sense a lot of hatred toward Muslims.Its one thing to hate the extremists, that's proper. There are those who feel all Muslims are evil and that Islam is evil. The rhetoric is typical. Watch this video. Look at this website. Read this Sura. See? See! They're evil, I told 'ya!!! Under the potent mix of (read carefully) nationalism and faith, I saw many Americans go way too far in their condemnation of one of the world's oldest and greatest religions.

I've been accused of suggesting the United States asked for an attack of that kind by its policies and practices for decades in the Middle East. Let me lay it out for all to see.

If I were to try and assign some value to responsibility for that terrible day, I'd probably come up with an 95/5 percent split. I hold the terrorists chiefly responsible for the loss of life that day. They planned it, financed it and executed it. They're the ones who designed it, who took flying lessons and who flew the planes, slit the throats, and crashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and if they could've, probably the Capitol. They own that. The terrorists do. No way around that...

Its simple to say the USA was purely innocent that day and just a victim. Its also wrong. For far too long, the US has directly and indirectly interfered with other Countries' affairs when it suited our interests. Trouble is, we're not the only ones with "interests." At times we've been invited, at other times not. We've over stayed our welcome in some places. We've crawled into bed with bad people we shouldn't have. It may work out in the short term, it rarely works out in the long term. (Remember when Osama Bin Laden was working for us against the Russians?)

Hopefully, our foreign policy is moving in a different direction. Those who say we should only act in the pure interests of the USA are wrong. We don't live in a vacuum. We share this world with many other people, faiths, and beliefs that don't always jive with ours. We should listen more and dictate less. Do we really always know best? Really? Really?

The big clunky nation building thing has failed on an epic level. The price tag has been enormous in both blood and money. Hunt down all the terrorists, those who would do us harm. Find them, kill them. Bring the troops home and dear God please think twice before sending our troops into harm's way the next time.

Islam, on the other hand, has a big problem that I don't think they're doing enough about. If I go searching, I can find anti terror statements from the Islamic world. But with the rhetoric of the far right, Christian conservatives and the likes of Fox News, I say they (Muslims) are not doing enough to reject terrorism. They are doing better, but when the next attack comes (and it will) I fear a loss of any ground gained in the last ten years. They should speak louder and more often. As silly as it sounds, every time an Iman preaches death to infidels, moderate Muslims must raise their voices above those that preach hate. It may not be fair, Christians aren't compelled every time a Fred Phelps says "God hates fags" to denounce him. He's fringe, everybody knows he's fringe and mostly ignores him. Except when he's protesting the funerals of fallen servicemen.

It may be a double standard, but there's a lot of people freaked out in the US about Muslims. So, they (Muslims) would be well advised to redouble their efforts in communicating their rejection of violence and those that preach it. Cast them out, if you will. Publicly and loudly. You have numbers-use them.

The hate speech I hear from some so called Christians is ugly and disgusting. Wrapped in equal parts the Bible and Flag, the allegations that all Muslims are out to kill all Christians was presented to me recently. I was a fool, they claimed, to not believe their words. According to this delusional wing of Christians and Political Conservatives, any Christians who seek co-existence with Islam have quite simply been duped. They know not the truth. The wingnuts of the far, far right have taken possession of that turf. All while portraying themselves as the real true Christians and the real true Patriots.

However well intentioned, however well meaning-this group is doing damage of unthinkable measure. Who's against God? Who's against the US of A? These are big, grand concepts and when snake oil salesmen start their pitch, too many people fall in line. To suggest they're wrong could bring the sincerity of your faith into question. Or your patriotism. Who wants to mess with that? Its easier to just go along, but its also dangerous.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Should 9/11 First Responders be offended at Anniversary DIS-invitation?

No, they shouldn't...

The tenth anniversary of the attacks of 9/11 is fast approaching and there's some coverage in the media that  New York City Mayor Micheal Bloomberg is way out of line by not inviting the "first responders" to the ceremonies that day.

Bloomberg's office issued a statement saying that due to space constraints, this year's September 11th memorial ceremony at ground zero (the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks) was to focus on the victims' family members, and that first responders (and other groups) would be honored at "different places and times."


There are those who feel everybody should be included in the ceremony, because leaving someone/anyone out seems wrong. I wouldn't say they're wrong. On the other hand, it seems likely to me that for this anniversary, they're trying to make it as special as they can for the family of those who lost loved ones. As much as the first responders; Police, Fire, EMS, etc. sacrificed that day, does the price tag they paid outweigh the price of the families? It's a damn sensitive question, but I say no, it does not.


It's important to note this is not an all or nothing position. If I suggest that the families suffered terribly it doesn't in any way mean I think the 1st responders did not. Of course they did. Everyone associated that day will carry scars of all shapes and sizes to the grave with them. It's silly and selfish of anyone to suggest that Mayor Bloomberg is purposefully elevating one group over another to discredit that group. Its ridiculous and offensive to try and turn this into some kind of political issue.


As I'm writing this, I see stories crossing the wires that Religious leaders will also be kept from the ceremony on September 11th. "There are hundreds of important people that have offered to participate over the last nine years," Evelyn Erskine, a mayoral spokeswoman told the Wall Street Journal in response to religious leaders' outrage, "but the focus remains on the families of the thousands who died on Sept. 11."


The invited guests, who include President Obama, former President George W. Bush, will read prepared lines of poetry and not make speeches. “We’ve tried very hard every year to keep the focus away from politics and politicians, and on families, where it belongs,” Bloomberg said at a news conference Thursday morning in Queens. “This day isn’t about any of us,” the mayor added, referring to the elected officials who will participate in the nationally televised ceremony next month. “It is about the families of the 3,000-odd people who lost their lives 10 years ago. And none of us in elective office, I think, should ever forget that.”


There is an event to be held on September 6th to honor all the first responders, which will also include religious leaders making remarks.


Its a slippery slope to decide who does and who doesn't get to attend an event like this. Open it up to everyone and while you increase the scope of the experience you almost certainly sacrifice some intimacy, some solemness perhaps by doing so. To decide who gets to attend and who doesn't isn't a fun job. No one wants to hurt anyone's feelings, but a decision was made and its a reasonable one. 






Sources: 


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/25/911-ceremony-wont-include_n_936336.html

http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2011/08/18/bloomberg-on-911-ceremony-no-political-speeches/

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Right call made on decision to not release Bin Laden pictures...

  As I drove from my first performance this afternoon to my second, I spent some time with Sean Hannity. He did most of the talking. One of the things he railed about today was the decision made by President Obama to not release any of the Bin Laden death photos. Likewise, we won't be seeing any of the burial video either. Hannity trashed the decision as the wrong one and rambled on and on and on and on.

  As chance would have it, on my ride home, I switched on Fox news on my XM radio and caught the end of The Factor and the first segment of Hannity's evening broadcast. Hannity's first guest was Col. Oliver North, who laid out several reasons why the choice Obama made was the correct one. Doesn't really change anything, it could make things tougher for US troops abroad, including Spc. Bowe Bergdahl, who is currently being held prisoner by the Taliban in Afghanistan. Also, people who doubt the Government's claims that Osama Bin Laden is dead, won't likely believe photos from that same Government.

 Hannity thrashed about and said he disagreed and moved on to the next topic. Which I'll get to in a moment.

 Also agreeing that President Obama made the right choice to not release anything were several other Republicans, including Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI). GOP Rep. Buck McKeon, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, told MSNBC that “I don’t see much to be gained by it.” “I think that that’s the president’s decision – he has a lot more information than I do,” he said. “I see some downside to it, but I think that’s his decision to make."


  To be fair, the jury is pretty divided on whether the photos should be released or not. I think its fair to say Obama (again) isn't choosing the more politically friendly path by holding on to the images. If he released, domestically, he'd win. No way to lose. I heard virtually no credit being given to him for that. RW talk show hosts can score cheap points by beating Obama up over this. Which is akin to someone trying to make a big deal about how many I's, me's and we's were in Obama's speech Sunday night. Its bullshit of the first order. I have to accept that some people apparently enjoy consuming large, seemingly endless quantities of hot, steamy bullshit day after day. Yuck...


  Now, back to Hannity's next topic. President Obama will be visiting with some of the 9/11 families tomorrow in New York City. He'll also visit Ground Zero and lay a wreath in memory of that terrible day. Hannity called it "Obama taking a victory lap...disgusting..." 


  Trouble is, a victory lap usually conjures up images of large, racous crowds, cheering wildly. Big speeches, too. That won't be the case tomorrow. Obama's visit with the 9/11 families is closed to the press and he'll be making no public remarks. I heard an interview with Carie Lemack of Families of September 11, who thought it was good that President Obama was coming. She was disappointed that former president Bush has declined his invitation to attend. 


  Hannity can certainly disagree with Obama's decisions to regarding both the release of the photos and his trip to NYC. Its his right. But for someone who wraps himself in both the Republican Party as well as the US Flag, you'd think he'd be more tolerant of his fellow GOP-ers who supported Obama's decision. That wouldn't make for good ratings, I guess. His criticism of the NYC trip as a "victory lap" is imbecilic and childish. What's hard to stomach is that given his popularity, a lot of people will go to sleep tonight thinking that our President has once again put the Country behind his ambition. 


  Which he most certainly isn't. 

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Bush Declines Obama's Ground Zero Invite

Bush Declines Obama's Ground Zero Invite

Is President Bush correct to decline the invitation? Was the invitation inappropriate from President Obama?