Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Fact Checking the 2nd Presidential Debate/Ten Websites to Review...

After every Presidential debate, various fact-checkers get to work immediately to separate fact from fiction from both participants. Reasonable Conversation has compiled a list of ten different factchecks from around the internet to provide a convenient "one-stop" place for your perusal.

The good folks at Politfact.com were hot on the trail of truth after last night's second presidential debate between President Barack Obama and challenger Mitt Romney. They've posted updated evaluations of claims made by both men on several different topics: Jobs, Energy, Taxes/Spending, Healthcare, Immigration, Foreign Policy and Education. Its a mixed bag of results showing that both men took liberties with the truth as they saw fit.

Not to be outdone, Factcheck.org has also posted their version of fact checking last evening's debate, covering many of the same issues. Here's the overview from their piece posted earlier this morning:

The second Obama-Romney debate was heated, confrontational and full of claims that sometimes didn’t match the facts.
  • Obama challenged Romney to “get the transcript” when Romney questioned the president’s claim to have spoken of an “act of terror” the day after the slaying of four Americans in Libya. The president indeed referred to “acts of terror” that day, but then refrained from using such terms for weeks.
  • Obama claimed Romney once called Arizona’s “papers, please” immigration law a “model” for the nation. He didn’t. Romney said that of an earlier Arizona law requiring employers to check the immigration status of employees.
  • Obama falsely claimed Romney once referred to wind-power jobs as “imaginary.” Not true. Romney actually spoke of “an imaginary world” where “windmills and solar panels could power the economy.”
  • Romney said repeatedly he won’t cut taxes for the wealthy, a switch from his position during the GOP primaries, when he said the top 1 percent would be among those to benefit.
  • Romney said “a recent study has shown” that taxes “will” rise on the middle class by $4,000 as a result of federal debt increases since Obama took office. Not true. That’s just one possible way debt service could be financed.
  • Romney claimed 580,000 women have lost jobs under Obama. The true figure is closer to 93,000.
  • Romney claimed the automakers’ bankruptcy that Obama implemented was “precisely what I recommend.” Romney did favor a bankruptcy followed by federal loan guarantees, but not the direct federal aid that Obama insists was essential.
  • Romney said he would keep Pell Grants for low-income college students “growing.” That’s a change. Both Romney and his running mate, Ryan, have previously said they’d limit eligibility.
Both candidates repeated false or misleading claims they have made, and we have rebutted, many times before. Obama repeated his claim that he wouldn’t put tax rates for affluent families higher than they were under Bill Clinton. Actually, he’s already signed two new taxes that will also fall on those same high-income persons. And Romney accused Obama of saying “no” to the Keystone XL pipeline. Actually, no final decision has been made, and the company says it expects to win approval and start construction early next year.
Other publications providing factchecking of the debate include The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Washington Times, Fox News offers a factcheck on President Obama's claim he called the events in Libya "terrorism" in the days following the death of four Americans. The Chicago Tribune, CBS News, Bloomberg and Politico also weigh in.

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Calamaties of Nature for March 24, 2012...


Time for a little smart humor from the good folks at Calamities of Nature...

Enjoy: (Click on the cartoon for a larger image..)

Friday, January 20, 2012

Do We Need the Department of Education?

A very interesting essay on why we don't need the Department of Education...

Written by Charles Murray, the WH Brady Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, Murray discusses three questions regarding the existence of the Department of Education.

1) Constitutionality...
2) The existence of problems so serious in scope that they could only be effectively addressed via a Federal Agency...
3) Its track record since its inception...

Enjoy...

THE CASE FOR the Department of Education could rest on one or more of three legs: its constitutional appropriateness, the existence of serious problems in education that could be solved only at the federal level, and/or its track record since it came into being. Let us consider these in order.
(1) Is the Department of Education constitutional?
At the time the Constitution was written, education was not even considered a function of local government, let alone the federal government. But the shakiness of the Department of Education’s constitutionality goes beyond that. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution enumerates the things over which Congress has the power to legislate. Not only does the list not include education, there is no plausible rationale for squeezing education in under the commerce clause. I’m sure the Supreme Court found a rationale, but it cannot have been plausible.
On a more philosophical level, the framers of America’s limited government had a broad allegiance to what Catholics call the principle of subsidiarity. In the secular world, the principle of subsidiarity means that local government should do only those things that individuals cannot do for themselves, state government should do only those things that local governments cannot do, and the federal government should do only those things that the individual states cannot do. Education is something that individuals acting alone and cooperatively can do, let alone something local or state governments can do.
I should be explicit about my own animus in this regard. I don’t think the Department of Education is constitutionally legitimate, let alone appropriate. I would favor abolishing it even if, on a pragmatic level, it had improved American education. But I am in a small minority on that point, so let’s move on to the pragmatic questions.
(2) Are there serious problems in education that can be solved only at the federal level?
The first major federal spending on education was triggered by the launch of the first space satellite, Sputnik, in the fall of 1957, which created a perception that the United States had fallen behind the Soviet Union in science and technology. The legislation was specifically designed to encourage more students to go into math and science, and its motivation is indicated by its title: The National Defense Education Act of 1958. But what really ensnared the federal government in education in the 1960s had its origins elsewhere—in civil rights. The Supreme Court declared segregation of the schools unconstitutional in 1954, but—notwithstanding a few highly publicized episodes such as the integration of Central High School in Little Rock and James Meredith’s admission to the University of Mississippi—the pace of change in the next decade was glacial.
Was it necessary for the federal government to act? There is a strong argument for “yes,” especially in the case of...
To continue reading, please click here...

Source:


Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Should we stop funding Liberal Arts Education with public dollars?


Florida Governor Rick Scott, citing shrinking financial resources, supports a strategy that would showed preferred funding for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math programs (STEM). Governor Scott says, "If I’m going to take money from a citizen to put into education then I’m going to take that money to create jobs,” Scott said. “So I want that money to go to degrees where people can get jobs in this state."

The Governor is expected to include several different reforms aimed at Colleges and Universities across Florida when he submits his new budget next January. With more money being provided to the STEM majors, less funds will be available for Liberal Arts majors, plus some other "science" based fields of study such as Psychology and Anthropology. Is it a vital interest of the state to have more anthropologists? I don’t think so.” says, Governor Scott. 

Now's probably a good time to mention that Governor Scott's daughter, Jordan Kandah, earned an Anthropology degree from William & Mary College. She did not work in the field, rather was a Special Education teacher before enrolling in a MBA program earlier this Fall. 


As fun as that sounds, its not really evidence that Scott's policy is hypocritical or would even be a bad one.

As I understand it, students would'nt be prevented from study Liberal Arts, they just wouldn't get as much public dollars via student grants and loans to do so. This wouldn't effect Scholarships or other private sources of tuition assistance.

I don't profess to know how the coffers for Florida higher education look at this moment. In general, with the shape of the economy, rising health care costs, unemployment's effect on the tax base, etc. it doesn't sound crazy to me to accept Scott's premise that there is less money to go around. The State is trying to direct its limited financial resources toward those fields of study that can lead to the highest paying jobs (i.e. produce the biggest financial payoff) for Florida.

The Governor is advocating for closer scrutiny for how the Public dollars are spent. That's not a bad thing.

As to the question of is it dangerous to have the Government start picking winning and losing Majors to back differently? Good question. Is there evidence that Florida is running short on STEM majors? Or the Country for that matter?

Some say yes....

Some say no...

I believe we absolutely need Liberal Arts majors to graduate and fill Society's needs for teachers, Psychologists and sure, Anthropologists. As income disparity worsens, the harshness of basic living is becoming more and more difficult. I say life is getting harder, not easier. As the world continues to shrink, the entire dynamic of how higher education, economics and our work-force interact is changing. Technology has replaced so many jobs in the labor pool, there aren't enough jobs to go around. Incomes are depressed, "savings" is hard to achieve when you have trouble paying your bills in the first place.

I believe we need better teachers, especially in the Journalism and English fields. Via the advance of the internet, more people are able to summon vast amounts of information on the subject of their choosing. The rub is, content from the internet, even from well known websites that advertise themselves as "THE place for News", or more "fair and balanced" than those other guys, isn't always accurate or impartial. Too often, people get their information...and develop subsequent opinions on an issue...from an agenda driven, biased news operation. Its difficult and time consuming to do research on topic, consider both sides viewpoints, fact check, etc. The more trained we are in reading, critical thought, etc. the better prepared we will, as a people, be able to cut through the noise and make decisions based on the facts of an issue.

We need smart people to help figure out our Country's future. I say we need both STEM people and Liberal Arts people taking their best collective whack at it.

It'll be a while before we can see the effect of Governor Scott's education reform, if it even survives through to the final budget. If it succeeds as designed, and unemployment spikes down in Florida, especially in the STEM fields, then the State will benefit in many ways. Will it justify the expected drop off in Liberal Arts education? Time will tell. At the point in time a shortage of available Liberal Arts degreed people is identified, the need would easily be filled by bringing in professionals from out of state. If its bad enough, perhaps a future Governor will adjust higher education funding once more.


Sources:

http://htpolitics.com/2011/10/10/rick-scott-wants-to-shift-university-funding-away-from-some-majors/

http://htpolitics.com/2011/10/12/rick-scotts-daughter-has-anthropology-degree/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/05/united-fair-economy/liberal-group-says-family-incomes-grew-equally-pri/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/

http://www.foxnews.com/

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2009-07-08-science-engineer-jobs_N.htm

http://www.livecareer.com/news/Education/Obama-We-Need-More-Scientists-and-Engineers_$$00753.aspx