Consider this from
Ezra Klein:
"Elections really are zero-sum
affairs. For one party to win, the other has to lose. The incentives this
creates are stunningly dysfunctional. Imagine a workplace where the only way to
win a promotion was for the boss to fire your colleague. Even worse, if he
likes your colleague’s work, you get a pay cut. Now imagine that your colleague
needs your help to finish a big, difficult project. Think you’re going to help
him?"
This dichotomy of incentives is at the heart of why we
see so little true bipartisan cooperation. Again from Klein:
"Bipartisanship is popular, and it typically redounds
to the particular benefit of the president. But bipartisanship is, unusually, a
precious political resource that the minority party has exclusive control over.
It is entirely in their power to make even an accommodating president
look like a polarizing figure who’s unable to work constructively with the
minority party. And more to the point, it’s entirely in their interest."
Our first two
presidents tried to warn us about the dangers of political parties.
George Washington:
John Adams:
"There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the
Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting
measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be
dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.”
Despite
that, the mold for political parties was
cast during Washington's time in office due to the competing views of either favoring a strong central government (preferred by Alexander Hamilton) or granting power to the states (championed by Thomas Jefferson).
As an aside, with the advent of political parties came partisan
and contentious media. In the early days of our government, newspapers
tended to be voices for one party of the other, and the truth wasn't always the objective. There are even Founding Father roots of partisan media: Benjamin
Franklin Bache, the great patriot's grandson, inherited his namesake's
printing equipment and ultimately published a newspaper that was fiercely
critical of Washington, Adams, and the Hamiltonian Federalists. Bache even suggested that
Washington corroborated with the British during the Revolutionary War, and during Adams' tenure his journalistic activities led to his being arrested under the Constitutionally dubious Alien and Sedition Acts.
Let's fast forward to
2008. President Obama is making serious overtures to both parties for a new spirit of bipartisan
collaboration. According to Bob Woodward
in "The Price of Politics":
"[Republican House minority leader Eric Cantor's chief of staff] Steven
Stombres … was impressed.
If this really was a bipartisan 'coming together' it was precisely what the
country needed at such a critical time, and as a citizen he found it genuinely
inspirational. As a Republican, though, he was worried: If Obama followed
through on this promise of political togetherness, Republicans would be in bad
shape.”
He need not have
worried - there were ample forces on both sides of the aisle to derail such an accomplishment.
It's easy to sit back and say that if we were in Washington we would act differently and be team players. But given the incentives that face our politicians, I'm not so sure. While one can justifiably question the extremes of political selfishness, as a general rule partisan behavior is quite rational.
Sources for this article:
http://www.ourwhitehouse.org/choosingsides.html
http://www.notable-quotes.com/p/political_parties_quotes.html
http://www.notable-quotes.com/p/political_parties_quotes.html
Woodward, Bob
(2012-09-11). The Price of Politics (p. 9). Simon & Schuster, Inc.. Kindle
Edition
No comments:
Post a Comment