Saturday, May 28, 2011

Politicians with guts? How about this guy?

  There's a lot of talk today about this candidate or that candidate having "guts."

  Hmmm...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Yesterday (Friday) I had an early morning gig about an hour South of home. In the car I tuned into XM channel 124, POTUS, which is a fairly middle of the road, low drama political/news channel. All politics all the time. They cover everything from the daily press briefings at the White House, to weekly State Dept. briefings, various hearings, etc. The kind of stuff commercial television and radio won't use. The kind of stuff I love.

  During the morning programming, they do a five minute "This Day in Political History" type thing, which I enjoy. At the end, they close it out with a section called "cake and candles" to recognize a few birthdays of politicians born on this day. Former Minnesota Senator, Democratic Presidential candidate and Lyndon Johnson's Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey would have turned one hundred years old today. To mark Humphrey's birthdate, they played a short clip from a speech he gave to the 1948 Democratic Convention in Philadelphia.

   Humphrey felt the Democratic Party should endorse a stronger civil rights platform for their nominee, Harry Truman, than had been proposed. (This somewhat tepid civil rights platform had been floated at the 1944 Convention as well.) This angered a group of Southern Democrats, who felt this was purely a States rights issue. All of the Mississippi and half of the Alabama delegation walked out of Convention Hall on July 14th, 1948 because of what Hubert Humphrey decided needed to be said that day. So enraged where the southern Democrats that they formed their own party, called the Dixiecrats, which were led by the Governor of South Carolina, Strom Thurmond.

   Here is Humphrey's 1948 Convention Speech on Civil Rights:


  Nominee Truman did not want Humphrey to make this speech, for fear it would splinter the party and hurt his chances of winning the Presidency. While Humphrey lays out a cogent case for civil rights, there's a section that stood out above the rest. 


  "To those who say, my friends, to those who say, that we are rushing this issue of civil rights, I say to them we are 172 years (too) late! To those who say, this civil rights program is an infringement on states' rights, I say this: the time has arrived in America for the Democratic Party to get out of the shadow of states' rights and walk forthrightly into the bright sunshine of human rights!"


  Think about it...That took guts...


  This wasn't the 1960's. It wasn't even the 1950's. It was 1948. Segregation was a way of life in the South. In 1963 Alabama Governor George Wallace said, "...segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!" For Humphrey to say what he said, at that time was groundbreaking. This wasn't baby steps anymore. It challenged an entire geographic section of our Country's population. 


  While it did become an official part of the Democratic platform for the election, which Truman famously won over Thomas Dewey, legislation protecting civil rights as the law of the land wouldn't become reality until 1964. Without Humphrey standing up that day, I wonder if we'd have seen the same timeline occur? I think it easily could have taken another decade with out his contribution. 


  So, as I hear of various politicians and presidential candidates today being described as "having guts," I think I will think of Humphrey and see if the label fits. Its one thing to say it, its another entirely to put a career on the line for it. 


  So, cake and candles to you, Mr. Humphrey, Happy 100th Birthday...


  Thank you...




Sources: 


http://www.mnhs.org/library/tips/history_topics/42humphreyspeech/transcript.htm


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Humphrey#The_1948_Democratic_National_Convention

7 comments:

  1. Very cool stuff. Thanks for turning me onto that speech, it's pretty powerful stuff. From what I can tell, it seems prior to his a speech a very small group of Democrats were in hard with Humphrey on pushing a juicier Civil Rights plank in '48. The party as a whole was perfectly content to agree with the Civil Rights movement in theory without really doing a whole hell of a lot about it, straddling the fence to appease the racist yokels. Good for him on doing his part in dragging them into doing the right thing.

    Good to know hiding behind "state's rights" as an excuse to stomp all over the equal rights of people who are different from you has a long and storied history in this country, eh? At least it's homosexuals this time around instead of blacks, which is a nice change of pace.

    ReplyDelete
  2. www.sodahead.com/united-states/so-what-do-all-you-races-baiter-have-to-say-about-this/question-1602643/?page=3

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm impressed that a relatively small figure in the party, a mayor of a B level city like Minneapolis would take such ballsy stance on a tough issue like Civil Rights. Truman didn't want him to do it, Southern Democrats damn sure didn't want him to, yet he did anyway.

    Is Humphrey given short shrift in the history of Civil Rights in this Country?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Perhaps, Bill. I don't recall his name coming up when I learned about Civil Rights in school, for example. I wasn't aware of the gravity of his contributions until you mentioned him...whether that's because he is given short-shrift or because of ignorance on my part is up for debate, I suppose.

    @Anonymous: That is some damn clever satire, perhaps precisely because I can see the most ignorant and misinformed among our nation's bigots nodding along and agreeing with it.
    ...
    ...
    Well, I wrote that and then searched for the piece on a hunch. That really was written by Buchanan, and apparently not as satire, but as a genuine laying out of his beliefs. What an unfortunate little man.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree, Joe. It's total ignorance and disregards every aspect of truth. Yet, to so many, it's like the Bible.
    How unfortunate it is being born white these days. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous-Mind sharing your name?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Then I would no longer be Anonymous, Bill.:)

    The main purpose of me posting this is the fact that many white people actually believe/buy this kind of nonsense.

    T--->so now you know ;)

    ReplyDelete